exposure of Dr. Valenzuela

The presentation of Doctor Valenzuela was very interesting in especial for me, because my area is the study of human reproduction, so I congratulate to the organizers.
I learned how is more important the moment when is administrate the drug that if is administrate after or before of the coitus, and exist collateral effects like if you administrate two doses you have 53% of ectopic pregnancy. Dr. Valenzuela exposed how is possible the postovulatory effects whit the study of the percentages of pregnancy in the fertility windows.
Also was very interesting know the posture of the Catholic Church about when start the life, and also know the point of view of the science when start the life, this is a controversial and important point in the society because there are many posture and beliefs.
This activity will be great if it can be done in the faculty with time protected for have arguments and form us an opinion of this topic, so we can help people.

I hope that these activities can be repeated, and I am grateful for issues was discussed because issues like the health system of the other countries or the preovulatory v/s preovulatory and postovulatory effect of LNG EC was very interesting for me, and us obligation like future professional of health is learn about this issues, I propose this activities doing again but whit more protected time for traduce the paper after the presentation of the expert.

A very good film

I would like to start congratulating Guillermo and the teacher for this activity, because I studied this topic in my course of Gestión y liderazgo and I can learn this issues in English and Spanish and I can have more vocabulary related whit my profession , so I think this activity was very appropriate for my professional formation.
I didn’t believe when I saw in the film that the health can be fair and have quality, the French and English systems are examples for our country, they are fair, they have a fast diagnostic, they have quality, opportunity, financial protection and it not depends of the social class of the patient. The people can be calm about the security in the hospitals, a mother can be calm if her baby is hospitalized, and the time of wait doesn’t exceed ten minutes.
This system have a lot of positive points, but maybe it could have negative aspects too, so I ask this question ¿what is better, English or North American system?, maybe the American system is not too bad and some things are been doing in a bad way.
Many people say that actual Chilean system is not better than the first system in the beginnings of public health, but that system broke, so ¿what is better?.
I think if the principal purpose is help the people and not the money and power, any system can be effective , but I think that the government have the obligation of give goods and gratuities service occupying the taxes of the people.